This advisory is suited to:
Businesses acquiring vehicles or fleets
Operators purchasing plant or heavy machinery
Contractors upgrading income-producing equipment
Businesses weighing purchase vs lease decisions
Clients needing fast execution without long-term damage
Asset
$1.1m excavator and attachments for a civil contractor working across government and tier-1 projects.
Problem
Income was lumpy and milestone-based, while standard asset finance repayments assumed smooth monthly cashflow. A conventional amortising loan would have created cash stress between project drawdowns.
Our Analysis
Reviewed contract payment cycles vs repayment profile
Assessed lender tolerance for seasonal and project-based income
Modelled repayment stress during low-activity months
Solution
Structured funding with:
Lower initial repayments
Seasonal cashflow alignment
Residual structured around project pipeline, not asset life
Result
The business scaled equipment capacity without cashflow compression during inactive periods.
Asset
$480,000 diagnostic imaging equipment for a new specialist practice.
Problem
Revenue ramp-up lagged equipment installation by several months due to:
Practitioner onboarding
Referral network build
Medicare billing cycles
Standard equipment finance assumed immediate full utilisation, creating early repayment risk.
Our Analysis
Mapped revenue ramp against repayment profile
Assessed asset resale risk vs lender comfort
Evaluated tax treatment and GST timing
Solution
Structured:
Deferred principal period
Lower early repayments during ramp-up
Repayment step-up aligned to expected utilisation
Result
The practice avoided early cashflow strain and stabilised operations before full debt service kicked in.
Asset
$680,000 CNC manufacturing machinery upgrade.
Problem
The business was concurrently negotiating a commercial property refinance. Ownership-based funding would have:
Increased reported leverage
Reduced serviceability
Weakened lender appetite on the property deal
Our Analysis
Assessed how lenders treat AASB 16 lease liabilities vs funded debt
Identified risk of “crowding out” property borrowing capacity
Modelled combined debt metrics under different structures
Solution
Recommended a lease-based structure assessed by lenders as an operating commitment rather than ownership debt, preserving balance-sheet flexibility during the refinance.
Result
Machinery upgraded without compromising property funding negotiations.
Asset
$750,000 refrigerated transport equipment (prime movers + refrigerated trailers).
Problem
Residual values on specialised transport assets are:
Highly sensitive to usage
Dependent on maintenance history
Volatile at refinance or exit
An aggressive residual would lower repayments short term but create balloon risk later.
Our Analysis
Stress-tested residual assumptions
Assessed secondary-market liquidity
Considered refinance and disposal scenarios
Solution
Structured funding with:
Conservative residual aligned to realistic resale value
Term matching asset fatigue profile
Clear exit strategy at maturity
Result
Lower long-term risk and no forced refinance pressure at end of term.
Independent, lender-agnostic advice
Deep understanding of asset-backed credit
Focus on structure, not just approval speed
Access to bank and non-bank funding pathways
Clear, disciplined recommendations